Title:

INDICATORS OF OPEN INNOVATIVE PROCESS AND EVALUATION OF STAGE OPENNESS OF THE ENTERPRISE

Authors:

Melnyk, Maryna
Nikitin, Yuri

Bibliographic description:

Melnyk, M. & Nikitin, Y. (2019) Indykatory vidkrytoho innovatsiinoho protsesu ta otsinka stupeniu vidkrytosti pidpryiemstva [Indicators of open innovative process and evaluation of stage openness of the enterprise]. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava [Socio-Economic Problems and the State] (electronic journal), Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 22-32. Available at: http://sepd.tntu.edu.ua/images/stories/pdf/2019/19mmvsvp.pdf

Issue Date:

31-may-2019

Submitted date:

feb-2019

Publisher:

Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2019.01.022

UDC:

330.341.42

JEL: 

А11

Keywords:

indicators
open innovation process
technological readiness of innovation

Pages:

11

First page: 

22

Last page:

32

Abstract:

Based on the analysis of the evaluation indicators of the innovation activity of enterprises and the analysis of their direct or indirect influence on the innovation process, the indicators of evaluation of the open innovation process are substantiated and offered. The methodology of evaluating the influence of participants of the open innovation process on the creation and introduction of innovations in terms of their technological readiness and type of innovation has been developed for 28 Ukrainian enterprises of small and medium business. It is determined that Ukrainian small and medium-sized enterprises with different types of innovations have different attitudes to market conditions, opening the boundaries for information exchange, attracting participants into the open innovation process and improving the system of measuring the creation and implementation of innovations. It is revealed that the innovative process of creation and implementation of organizational and marketing innovations is more open than the innovative process of creation and implementation of product and process innovations and this is explained by the fact that the protection of intellectual property is not necessary in case of creation and implementation of organizational and marketing innovations as they do not result in production and technical know-how. It is determined that enterprises that are focused on product and process innovations are mostly manufacturing companies. The main participants in the creation and implementation of product innovations are identified as top management, employees and partners; of process innovations – as top management, employees, consumers and outsourcing. It is noted that enterprises that create and implement marketing and organizational innovations focus on attracting both internal and external participants of the open innovation process. The understanding of the array of indicators of the innovation process is deepen.

Keywords: indicators, open innovation process, technological readiness of innovation.

URI: 

http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/handle/lib/28738

ISSN: 

2223-3822

Copyright owner:

Scientific Journal "Socio-Economic Problems and the State"

References: 

1. Montoya-Weiss Mitzi, M., Calantone Roger (1994) Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0737678294900299  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1150397
2. Beroggi, G., Lévy, M., Cardinet, E. (2006) Designing a model for innovation indicators from a systems perspective. Retrieved from: http://www.inderscience.com/offer.php?id=10911  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2006.010911
3. Fleuren, M., Paulussen, T., Dommelen, P., van Burren, S. (2014) Towards a measurement instrument for determinants of innovations. Retrieved from: https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/26/5/501/1792113  https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzu060
4. Überholspur Innovation Messung, Bewertung, und Steigerung der Innovationsfähigkeit durch (2007). Retrieved from: https://wiki.iao.fraunhofer.de/images/studien/ueberholspur-innovation.pdf
5. Eurostat 2018, Statistics explained - Community innovation survey (CIS). Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?Title= Glossary: Community_innovation_survey_(CIS).
6. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD (2005). Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2367614.pdf
7. European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.ewi-vlaanderen.be/sites/default/files/imce/eu_innovatie_scorebord_2018.pdf
8. Andrew, J. P., Manget, J., Michael, D. C., Taylor, A., Zablit, H. (2010) Innovation 2010: a Return to Prominence - And the Emergence of a New World Order. Retrieved from: https://www.bcg.com/documents/file42620.pdf
9. Chan, V., Musso, C., Shankar, V. (2008) McKinsey Global Survey Results: assessing Innovation Metrics. Retrieved from: https://www.scopus.com/home.uri
10. Freudenberg, M. (2003) Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaaa/2003-16-en.html
11. Becheikh, N., Landry, R., Amara, N. (2006) Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: a systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497205001033  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016
12. Dziallas Marisa, Blind Knut (2019) Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497217301402  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005
13. Nikitin, Y., Melnik, M. (2017) Development of innovation evolution and open innovation process model of scientific organizations and enterprises of Ukraine, Tekhnolohichnyi audyt ta rezervy vyrobnytstva, Vol. 3/5(35), pp.38-43.  https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.102156

Issue type:

Article

Appears in Collections:

Scientific Journal "Socio-Economic Problems and the State", Vol.20, No.1