APPLICATION OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT INSTRUMENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES
Title: | APPLICATION OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT INSTRUMENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES |
Authors: | Bezverkhnuik, Tatiana Sencha, Irina Peklun, Katerina |
Affiliation: | Odessa Regional Institute for Public Administration of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine 22 Genoese str., Odessa, 65009, Ukraine e-mail: tatiana.bezverkhniuk@gmail.com |
Bibliographic description: | Bezverkhnuik, T., Sencha, I. & Peklun, K. (2019) Zastosuvannia instrumentiv portfelnoho upravlinnia v rozvytku terytorii [Application of portfolio management instruments in the development of territories]. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava [Socio-Economic Problems and the State] (electronic journal), Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 49-61. Available at: http://sepd.tntu.edu.ua/images/stories/pdf/2019/19btmvrt.pdf |
Issue Date: | dec-2019 |
Submitted date: | oct-2019 |
Publisher: | Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2019.02.049 |
UDC: | 328.184 351 316.77 |
JEL: | Q010 |
Keywords: | portfolio management territory development portfolio optimization model prioritization of portfolio components |
Pages: | 49-69 |
First page: | 49 |
Last page: | 61 |
Abstract: | The article identifies specific problems of applying portfolio management methods and tools in the public sphere, related to both the features of the management system and the characteristics of the portfolio and projects - portfolio components. The analysis of approaches to optimization of the portfolio of projects in the public sphere is presented taking into account the fact that the projects are most often aimed not at obtaining the budget revenue but at achieving the socially significant goal, obtaining the socially significant result. The justification of the three-stage evaluation procedure for the components of the tourist territory development portfolio is provided, which allows: at the pre-selection stage to evaluate and rank each component of the portfolio according to the degree of compliance with the strategic goals of the territory development; in the second stage, supplement the assessment of the portfolio components with quantitative performance indicators showing changes in the tourist flow and corresponding changes in local budget revenues, as well as changes in the revenues of the tourism entities as the most significant stakeholder of the portfolio; in the third stage - to form an optimal set of portfolio components based on efficiency criteria and taking into account the restrictions on the volume of annual investments into the portfolio. The corresponding optimization issue of finding the maximum of the objective function - the volume of revenues from the total tourist flow, subject to the constraints of annual investments, is presented. The experience of forming a portfolio of projects of tourist territory development with its maximum efficiency and limitations on resources is covered. |
URI: | http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/handle/lib/30946 |
ISSN: | 2223-3822 |
Copyright owner: | Scientific Journal "Socio-Economic Problems and the State" |
URL-посилання пов’язаного матеріалу: | http://sepd.tntu.edu.ua/images/stories/pdf/2019/19btmvrt.pdf https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/standard-for-portfolio-management https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/optimizatsiya-investitsionnogo-portfelya-v-kontekste-prakticheskoy-realizatsii-risk-orientirovannogo-podhoda-mnogoobrazie-metodov-i http://www.dridu.dp.ua/zbirnik/2009-01/Chikarenko_IStat.pdf |
References: | 1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK guide) – 6 Ed. Project Management Institute, Inc. Independent Publishers Group. Chicago, IL, 2017. 756 c. 2. The Standard for Portfolio Management – Fourth Edition (2017). Project Management Institute, Inc. Independent Publishers Group. Available at: https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/standard-for-portfolio-management (accessed 5 September 2019) 3. Anshyn, V. M., Demkyn, Y. V., Nykonov, Y. M., Tsarkov, Y. N. (2007) Modely upravlenyia portfelem proektov v uslovyiakh neopredelennosty [Project portfolio management models under conditions of uncertainty]. Moscow: МАТI. (in Russian) 4. Balynin, I. V. (2016) Optymizatsiia investytsiinoho portfelia v konteksti praktychnoi realizatsii ryzyk-oriientovanoho pidkhodu: riznomanittia metodiv i pryntsypiv [Optimization of the investment portfolio in the context of practical implementation of risk-oriented approach: a variety of methods and principles]. Ekonomichnyi analiz teoriia i praktyka. vol. 10 (457), Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/optimizatsiya-investitsionnogo-portfelya-v-kontekste-prakticheskoy-realizatsii-risk-orientirovannogo-podhoda-mnogoobrazie-metodov-i (accessed 5 September 2019) 5. Katrenko, A. V. (2013) Formuvannia portfelia proektiv za dopomohoiu dvoetapnoi protsedury [Formation of portfolio of projects through a two-step procedure]. Visnyk natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska Politekhnika», no. 770, pp. С. 169-176 6. Lyshanlo, S. V. (2013) Metodi ocenky effektyvnosty portfelja ynnovacyonno-ynvestycyonnykh proektov predpryjatyja [Methods for assessing the effectiveness of the portfolio of innovative and investment projects of the enterprise] (PhD Thesis), Moscow: [State Academy of Professional Retraining and Advanced Training of Executive Officers and Investment Specialists]. 7. Mazur, Y. Y. (2013) Effektyvnij menedzhment [Effective management]. Moscow: Graduate School. (in Russian) 8. Molokanova, V. M., Domin H. K. (2013) Metodologhichni zasady portfeljno-orijentovanogho upravlinnja rozvytkom orghanizacij [Methodological principles of portfolio-oriented management of organization development]. Visnyk Prydniprovsjkoji derzhavnoji akademiji budivnyctva ta arkhitektury, no. 5, pp. 57-64. 9. Poljushkin, S. S. (2013) Vykorystannja instrumentariju proektnogho analizu v upravlinni stalym rozvytkom mista-meghapolisa [Use of project analysis tools in managing the sustainable development of a metropolitan city]. Derzhava ta reghiony. Ser.: Derzhavne upravlinnja, vol. 1, pp. С. 156-161. 10. Rudenko, S. V., Ghlovackaja, S. Y., Kolesnykova, E. V. (2013) Modelj ocenky effektyvnosty portfelja proektov [Project performance assessment models]. Visnyk Odesjkogho nacionaljnogho morsjkogho universytetu, no. (38), pp. 149-154. 11. Sencha, I. A. (2016) Obghruntuvannja optymaljnosti portfeljnogho pidkhodu pry realizaciji antykryzovykh strateghij [Justification of the portfolio approach optimality in the implementation of the anti-crisis strategies]. Derzhava ta reghiony. Ser.: Derzhavne upravlinnja, vol. 2(54), pp. 20-24. 12. Chykarenko I.A. (2009) Portfeljnyj pidkhid v upravlinni proektamy: adaptacija do sfery municypaljnogho menedzhmentu [Portfolio approach in Project Management: adaptation to municipal management area] Publichne administruvannja: teorija i praktyka, vol. 1(1). Available at: http://www.dridu.dp.ua/zbirnik/2009-01/Chikarenko_IStat.pdf (accessed 5 September 2019). |
Issue type: | Article |
Appears in Collections: |
Scientific Journal "Socio-Economic Problems and the State", Vol.21, No.2 |